1. Home

Updated Comments on Article 26 of the OECD Model Convention

In February 2024, the Council of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) approved updated comments to Article 26 (Exchange of Information) of the OECD Model Convention. These changes aim to streamline the process of international tax cooperation and information exchange.

As a result of the update, technical amendments were made to align with the provisions of the Guidance on the Application of Confidentiality Provisions in the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters and Article 26 of the OECD Model Convention, including comments from February 8, 2021.

Particular attention is given to the fact that information obtained through administrative assistance can be used for tax matters concerning individuals other than those originally provided, to the extent that it affects the outcome of a tax case involving such specific taxpayers. Rules and conditions for the exchange of information not pertaining to specific taxpayers, including statistical data on exchanged information or derived from it, which may be disclosed to third parties, are also established.

The OECD document released last year examines the benefits, conditions, and challenges of using information exchanged under double taxation avoidance agreements (DTAs) for non-tax purposes, including combating illegal financial flows. It proposes possible approaches to optimize and streamline this form of cooperation, based on experience gained through the Latin American Initiative. This is relevant for discussion in the context of the question: “How does this information become accessible?”

You can find original document via this link.

Our team is always ready to provide high-quality advice and help in solving any tasks you set. Subscribe to our pages on social networks. If you have any questions, want to order services or consultations from us, then follow this link or write to us on WhatsApp/Viber/Telegram +380 98 363 6493 or call us.

  1. Home

Tax Obligations of Swiss Holding Companies

Have you ever heard the term “dividends” tossed around in conversations about investing and wondered what it really means? Don’t worry, you’re not alone. Understanding dividends can seem like deciphering a foreign language at first, but it’s actually quite straightforward once you break it down.

Picture this, you’re a part-owner of a company because you’ve invested in their stock. Now, when that company does well and makes a profit, they might decide to share some of that profit with you. That’s essentially what dividends are – your share of the company’s success.

But why would a company share its profits with you? Well, think of it as a way for them to say “thank you” for investing in them. By paying dividends, companies attract more investors who see it as a sign of stability and reliability.

So, how does it all work? Dividends are usually paid out regularly, like clockwork. Depending on how many shares you own and how much the company decides to dish out, you’ll receive your share of the profits.

In this article, we’ll delve deeper into the world of dividends. We’ll explore the different types of dividends, why they matter, and the potential risks involved. By the time you’re done reading, you’ll have a better grasp of dividends and how they fit into the puzzle of investing. So, let’s embark on this journey together and unravel the mysteries of dividends!

Corporate Income Tax Regulations for Swiss Holding Companies

Switzerland, known for its stable economy and favorable tax environment, attracts numerous multinational corporations to establish holding companies within its borders. These holding companies play a pivotal role in managing group structures, facilitating cross-border investments, and optimizing tax efficiency. However, understanding the intricate landscape of corporate income tax regulations at the federal, cantonal, and communal levels is paramount for these entities to maximize their benefits while ensuring compliance with Swiss tax laws.

Federal Level Taxation:

At the federal level, Swiss holding companies face a corporate income tax rate of 8.5%, constituting a flat tax rate. However, due to the tax deductibility of corporate taxes, the effective federal corporate income tax rate is reduced to 7.8%. It’s noteworthy that federal taxes also encompass stamp duties, including issuance stamp tax and security transfer tax, alongside withholding taxes levied on dividends and specific interest payments. Additionally, value-added tax (VAT) obligations must be fulfilled by companies engaged in taxable transactions.

Understanding Participation Relief:

Swiss holding companies may qualify for participation relief, a significant tax advantage. This relief mitigates the federal corporate income tax burden on dividends and capital gains derived from qualifying participations. To qualify, the holding company must meet specific criteria: either owning at least 10% of the distributing entity’s participation or holding participations with a fair market value exceeding CHF 1 million. Furthermore, holding companies benefit from participation relief on capital gains if they sell at least 10% of the share capital, provided the participation has been held for a minimum of one year.

Cantonal and Communal Taxation:

The cantonal and communal tax landscape further shapes the tax planning strategies of Swiss holding companies. Holding status exemptions, available at the cantonal level, offer relief from corporate income tax, provided certain conditions are met. Notably, the holding company must primarily focus on long-term participation management, with two-thirds of its assets or income derived from such participations. Moreover, the company cannot engage in commercial activities within Switzerland, although it can perform management functions and provide support services to the group.

Beyond corporate income tax, Swiss holding companies must navigate additional taxes imposed at the cantonal and communal levels. These encompass equity capital tax, real estate capital gains tax, real estate transfer tax, and immovable property tax, each varying based on the respective canton or commune’s regulations.

Understanding Dividend Declaration and Distribution in Swiss Holding Companies

Dividend declaration and distribution in Swiss holding companies, operating in the form of joint-stock corporations, follow a structured process governed by specific conditions:

  1. Approval of Financial Statements: Dividends can only be declared based on audited financial statements formally approved by the shareholders at the shareholders’ meeting.
  2. Source of Dividend Payment: Dividends must be paid out of the balance sheet profit or the freely available reserves of the company.
  3. Allocation to Legal Reserves: Before distributing dividends, the company must allocate funds to the general legal reserves as required by law and the articles of association.

Tax implications are a crucial aspect of dividend distribution in Switzerland. Various taxes are levied on federal, cantonal, and communal levels, with each level imposing its own set of obligations and consequences.

Here are the key taxes levied on Swiss holding companies across the three levels:

Understanding these tax implications is essential for Swiss holding companies to effectively manage their finances and comply with regulatory requirements.

In summary, dividend declaration and distribution in Swiss holding companies involve careful adherence to legal requirements, including approval of financial statements and allocation to legal reserves. Additionally, navigating the tax landscape is crucial to ensure compliance and optimize financial management at the federal, cantonal, and communal levels.

Equity Capital Tax:

The equity capital tax is exclusively imposed at the cantonal and communal levels within Switzerland. This tax is calculated based on the aggregate of various financial metrics, including the nominal share capital, reserves, retained earnings, and specific hidden reserves. The applicable tax rates for equity capital tax vary depending on the canton and commune where the Swiss holding company is situated.

In some cantons, a flat rate is applied at the cantonal level. For instance, in Zurich city and Zug city, the combined cantonal and communal tax rates stand at 0.0344% and 0.0030%, respectively.

Federal Withholding Tax on Dividends:

Dividend distributions from Swiss holding companies are subject to a 35% federal withholding tax. However, this rate can be reduced to nil or a specific remaining withholding tax rate under applicable treaties or directives. Repayment of share capital and reserves resulting from qualifying contributions made by direct shareholders, such as capital surplus and contributions, may be exempt from federal withholding tax.

Under the taxation of savings agreement between Switzerland and the European Union, no withholding tax is levied on cross-border dividends from a Swiss-resident company to a recipient company in the European Union if certain conditions are met, including a minimum two-year holding period and a minimum 25% share capital participation.

Royalties and Interest:

Exceptions notwithstanding, no federal withholding tax is imposed on royalties and interest payments in Switzerland, provided the financing instrument qualifies as a bond. However, if royalties or interests are not paid at arm’s length, authorities may classify part of the payment as a constructive dividend, potentially triggering a federal withholding tax of 35%.

Swiss Value-Added Tax (VAT):

Switzerland levies a value-added tax (VAT) on various transactions, including the supply of goods or services for consideration within Switzerland, receipt of services for consideration from enterprises domiciled outside Switzerland, and the import of goods. The VAT is calculated based on the consideration or price paid for the supply of goods or services at a standard rate of 8%. Certain goods and services enjoy a more favorable VAT rate, such as those for personal consumption (books, newspapers), accommodation, medical treatment, and education.

Stamp Duties:

Stamp duties are essential considerations for Swiss holding companies engaging in various corporate actions. Let’s explore the implications of issuance stamp tax and security transfer tax, alongside mechanisms to mitigate international double taxation and the Swiss tax rulings system.

Issuance Stamp Tax:

Upon the incorporation of a Swiss holding company, an issuance stamp tax is levied if the founders’ contribution exceeds CHF 1,000,000. This tax amounts to 1% of the fair market value of the founders’ contributions. However, exemptions or relief may be sought in the case of reorganizations such as mergers, spin-offs, or transformations. Notably, no issuance stamp tax is due in specific scenarios, including the relocation of the registered seat to Switzerland, quasi-mergers, or the establishment of a Swiss branch by a foreign company.

Security Transfer Tax:

A security transfer tax applies to the consideration paid for the transfer of certain securities, including shares, debentures, and participations in collective investment schemes, provided one party qualifies as a securities dealer. The tax rate stands at 0.15% for Swiss securities and 0.3% for foreign securities. Swiss holding companies often meet the criteria for securities dealers, especially if they own taxable securities exceeding a book value of CHF 10 million.

International Double Tax Treaties:

To alleviate the burden of international double taxation, Switzerland has entered into favorable double tax treaties with over 80 countries. These treaties aim to prevent taxpayers from being subjected to similar taxes on the same income in two different jurisdictions. Such agreements provide clarity and facilitate cross-border business activities, promoting economic cooperation and investment.

Swiss Tax Rulings System:

Although not explicitly mandated by Swiss tax regulations, the tax rulings system is a common practice. Companies often seek written approval from tax authorities before executing transactions, particularly restructurings. Rulings cover various aspects of taxation and remain valid as long as the facts remain unchanged, and there are no alterations in relevant laws.

Conclusion:

In the dynamic ecosystem of Swiss holding companies, effective dividend declaration, distribution practices, and tax management are imperative for sustaining financial health and fostering shareholder confidence. By navigating regulatory landscapes, leveraging tax optimization strategies, and embracing strategic foresight, Swiss holding companies can chart a course towards sustainable growth and enduring success in today’s ever-evolving business landscape.

Our team is always ready to provide high-quality advice and help in solving any tasks you set. Subscribe to our pages on social networks. If you have any questions, want to order services or consultations from us, then follow this link or write to us on WhatsApp/Viber/Telegram +380 98 363 6493 or call us.

  1. Home

Tax Optimization: S-Corp

In the realm of business taxation, the selection of the appropriate entity structure can significantly impact the financial standing and growth trajectory of a company. While the term “corporation” typically evokes images of traditional C-corporations, there exists a lesser-known yet highly advantageous tax designation: the S-corporation (S-corp). This comprehensive guide aims to illuminate the intricate nuances of S-corporations, elucidating their distinct advantages and considerations when juxtaposed against other business structures.

Deciphering the Anatomy of S-Corps

What Constitutes a Corporation?

A corporation, at its core, is a legally recognized business entity established by filing incorporation documents with the appropriate state authority. Diverging from the simplicity of sole proprietorships, partnerships, or Limited Liability Companies (LLCs), corporations boast a hierarchical structure comprising shareholders, directors, and officers. While shareholders hold ownership stakes through stock, directors delineate strategic directives, and officers oversee daily operations, often shouldered by a single individual in smaller enterprises.

Crucially, corporations afford shareholders limited liability, shielding them from personal liability for corporate debts. Nevertheless, this shield comes with the obligation of adhering to statutory requirements, including holding regular meetings and maintaining meticulous corporate records.

Demystifying the S-Corp

In contrast to a mere business entity, an S-corporation represents a tax election available to specific corporations and LLCs. Derived from subchapter “S” of the Internal Revenue Code, the S-corp designation revolutionizes tax implications through its distinctive “pass-through” tax structure.

S-Corp vs. Other Structures

Pass-Through Advantages:

S-corps epitomize the concept of pass-through taxation, seamlessly channeling corporate income, losses, deductions, and credits to shareholders for federal tax assessment. Unlike their C-corp counterparts, S-corps bypass federal corporate income tax, rendering shareholders subject to individual tax rates on dividends. This tax efficiency empowers shareholders to offset corporate losses with personal income, circumventing the burdensome phenomenon of double taxation endured by C-corp shareholders.

Liability Protection:

Beyond tax incentives, S-corps inherit the invaluable shield of limited liability characteristic of traditional corporations. Distinct from shareholders, S-corporations maintain an autonomous existence, fostering operational continuity and facilitating seamless ownership transitions. Nonetheless, stringent shareholder constraints and eligibility prerequisites may temper growth prospects for aspiring S-corporations.

Navigating S-Corp Eligibility and Compliance

S-Corp Eligibility Criteria

The allure of S-corp status is tempered by rigorous eligibility criteria, encompassing shareholder limitations and nationality constraints. The regulatory framework stipulates a ceiling of 100 shareholders, predominantly composed of U.S. citizens, permanent residents, select trusts, estates, or tax-exempt entities. Furthermore, vigilant oversight by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) ensures adherence to prescribed guidelines, particularly regarding the reasonableness of shareholder salaries to deter tax evasion.

Evaluating S-Corp Viability: Pros and Cons

Advantages of S-Corps

  1. Tax Efficiency: Pass-through taxation mitigates the specter of double taxation prevalent in C-corp structures.
  2. Liability Protection: S-corps uphold the coveted shield of limited liability, safeguarding shareholders from personal liability.
  3. Operational Autonomy: S-corporations maintain an independent existence, fostering operational continuity and facilitating seamless ownership transitions.

Disadvantages of S-Corps

  1. Shareholder Limitations: A cap of 100 shareholders imposes growth constraints on aspiring S-corporations.
  2. Compliance Stringency: Stringent eligibility criteria and IRS scrutiny mandate meticulous adherence to regulatory obligations.
  3. Limited Equity Financing: Compared to C-corporations, S-corps encounter challenges in raising equity capital due to shareholder restrictions.

Exploring Alternative Business Structures

C-Corps: The Traditional Vanguard

C-corporations, synonymous with the archetypal corporate structure, endure double taxation but offer unlimited shareholder potential and global market access.

LLCs: Flexible Hybrid Entities

LLCs amalgamate the flexibility of partnerships with the liability protection of corporations, affording members versatile tax treatment and regulatory simplicity.

Sole Proprietorships: Simplicity Amidst Risk

Sole proprietorships epitomize simplicity and owner autonomy but entail heightened personal liability and regulatory burdens.

Partnerships: Collaborative Ventures

Partnerships epitomize collaborative ventures, enabling shared tax burdens and liabilities, with variants like Limited Partnerships (LPs) or Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) catering to diverse industry needs.

Conclusion: Empowering Informed Decision-Making

In the labyrinth of business structuring, the selection of the optimal entity designation demands meticulous analysis and strategic foresight. While S-corporations offer a tantalizing array of tax advantages and liability protections, their viability hinges on alignment with specific business objectives and compliance with regulatory strictures. Armed with comprehensive insights into S-corp intricacies and alternative structures, entrepreneurs can embark on the path to sustained prosperity with clarity and confidence.

Our team is always ready to provide high-quality advice and help in solving any tasks you set. Subscribe to our pages on social networks. If you have any questions, want to order services or consultations from us, then follow this link or write to us on WhatsApp/Viber/Telegram +380 98 363 6493 or call us.

  1. Home

Corporate Taxation in Switzerland for 2024

Navigating Switzerland corporate tax landscape requires a comprehensive understanding of federal, cantonal, and municipal tax structures, particularly in light of ongoing tax reforms and international tax rate changes. This guide offers detailed insights into each component of Swiss corporate taxation, highlighting regional variations across cantons and providing strategic recommendations for businesses operating in Switzerland.

Swiss Corporate Tax System: An In-Depth Analysis To grasp the intricacies of Switzerland’s corporate tax system, it’s crucial to delve into its multi-layered structure:

  1. Federal Taxation:
    • The Confederation imposes a direct federal tax (IFD) on company profits, maintaining a consistent rate across all Swiss cantons.
  2. Cantonal Taxation:
    • Swiss cantons levy their own tax rates on both profits and capital, resulting in significant regional variations in tax burdens.
    • Each canton has the autonomy to set its tax rates, leading to a diverse tax landscape across Switzerland.
    • Understanding these variations is essential for businesses considering establishment or relocation within the country.
  3. Municipal Taxation:
    • Municipalities further contribute to the tax landscape by imposing their own levies, adding another layer of complexity for businesses operating at the local level.

Navigating Double Economic Taxation: For Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) and Corporations, navigating double taxation is a pivotal aspect of corporate tax planning:

Corporate Tax Components in Switzerland:

  1. Corporate Profit Tax:
    • Switzerland imposes federal and cantonal profit taxes on LLCs and Corporations, with rates varying significantly across cantons.
    • Understanding the nuances of federal and cantonal tax rates is crucial for businesses seeking to optimize their tax liabilities.
  2. Capital Tax:
    • Administered solely at the cantonal level, capital tax complements profit taxation and is calculated based on a company’s capital and reserves accumulated over time.
    • Variations in capital tax rates among cantons can influence business investment decisions and capital allocation strategies.

Selecting Tax-Friendly Cantons for Business Establishment: Choosing the right canton for business domicile is a strategic decision that can significantly impact tax liabilities:

Comparative Analysis of Corporate Tax Rates Across Swiss Cantons for 2024: A comprehensive comparison of corporate tax rates across Swiss cantons reveals notable variations:

  1. Zug (ZG) -11.85%
  2. Nidwald (NW) – 11.97%
  3. Lucerne (LU) – 12.20%
  4. Glarus (GL) – 12.31%
  5. Uri (UR) – 12.63%
  6. Appenzell Innerrhoden (AI) – 12.66%
  7. Obwald (OW) – 12.74%
  8. Appenzell Ausserrhoden (AR) – 13.04%
  9. Basel-Stadt (BS) – 13.04%
  10. Thurgau (TG) – 13.21%
  11. Neuchâtel (NE) – 13.57%
  12. Schaffhausen (SH) – 13.80%
  13. Fribourg (FR) – 13.87%
  14. Geneva (GE) – 14.00%
  15. Vaud (VD) – 14.00%
  16. Schwyz (SZ) – 14.06%
  17. St. Gallen (SG) – 14.40%
  18. Graubünden (GR) – 14.77%
  19. Solothurn (SO) – 15.29%
  20. Jura (JU) – 16.00%
  21. Valais (VS) – 17.12%
  22. Aargau (AG) – 17.42%
  23. Basel-Landschaft (BL) – 17.97%
  24. Ticino (TI) – 19.16%
  25. Zurich (ZH) – 19.65%
  26. Bern (BE) – 21.04%

Adapting to the Evolving Tax Landscape in 2024: As Switzerland navigates the evolving global tax landscape, businesses must remain agile and proactive:

Conclusion: In conclusion, a comprehensive understanding of federal, cantonal, and municipal tax structures is essential for businesses operating in Switzerland. By leveraging strategic tax planning initiatives and capitalizing on regional tax incentives, businesses can optimize their tax liabilities and position themselves for long-term success in Switzerland’s dynamic business environment. For personalized advice and expert guidance on corporate taxation in Switzerland, consult with our team of experienced tax professionals and legal advisors.

Our team is always ready to provide high-quality advice and help in solving any tasks you set. Subscribe to our pages on social networks. If you have any questions, want to order services or consultations from us, then follow this link or write to us on WhatsApp/Viber/Telegram +380 98 363 6493 or call us.

  1. Home

Cyprus-France Tax Agreement: Boosting Economic Relations

December 11, 2023, in Nicosia, the Convention for the Elimination of Double Taxation with Respect to Taxes on Income and the Prevention of Tax Evasion and Avoidance, along with its Protocol, was signed between the Republic of Cyprus and the French Republic. Mr. Makis Keravnos, the Minister of Finance of Cyprus, and Mrs. Salina Grenet-Catalano, the Ambassador of France to Cyprus, signed the Convention on behalf of their respective countries.

This newly signed Convention replaces the previous one from December 1981, aligning with the latest international tax standards. It is expected to bolster trade and economic relations between Cyprus and France, ensuring fairness and equity.

The agreement offers tax certainty to companies, organizations, and individuals, providing clear guidelines on the taxation of income and capital gains for both current and prospective investors. Based on the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income (2017 Model), it incorporates the minimum standards of the Base Erosion Profit Shifting (BEPS) project set by the OECD/G20.

Additionally, the new tax agreement between Cyprus and France outlines the following provisions:

By expanding and updating its network of Double Taxation Conventions, the government underscores its commitment to promoting Cyprus as a key international business hub, signifying both economic and political significance.

Our team is always ready to provide high-quality advice and help in solving any tasks you set. Subscribe to our pages on social networks. If you have any questions, want to order services or consultations from us, then follow this link or write to us on WhatsApp/Viber/Telegram +380 98 363 6493 or call us.

  1. Home

Corporate Taxation in Hong Kong

Renowned for its business-friendly environment, Hong Kong beckons international enterprises with its straightforward and territorial tax regime. However, unraveling the intricacies of this system demands a nuanced understanding of your business operations and profit generation mechanisms. This extensive guide aims to dissect the multifaceted landscape of corporate taxation in Hong Kong, empowering you to discern your tax obligations and capitalize on financial opportunities.

Deciphering Key Terminology:

Before delving into the depths of Hong Kong’s tax framework, it’s imperative to elucidate essential terminology:

  1. Offshore Status: Contrary to common perception, “offshore” denotes a tax classification rather than merely the geographical location of a company. Enterprises registered in Hong Kong can seek offshore status, absolving them from taxes on profits earned beyond Hong Kong’s borders. However, this exemption necessitates adherence to stringent criteria and approval from the Inland Revenue Department (IRD).
  2. Onshore Entities: These are companies predominantly conducting business activities within Hong Kong and are consequently liable to pay regular corporate taxes on their global earnings.

Navigating the Intricacies of Hong Kong’s Tax Regime:

Hong Kong’s tax system boasts distinctive characteristics:

Maximizing Tax Advantages:

Hong Kong extends an array of tax incentives to attract businesses:

Depreciation Allowances: Sizeable deductions can be claimed for various expenses, including: Machinery and equipment: A 100% write-off for acquisitions related to manufacturing and technology. Building renovations: A 5-year write-off period for refurbishing business premises. Environmentally Friendly Initiatives: A 100% deduction for investments in eco-friendly equipment and vehicles. Tax Concessions: Certain sectors, such as mutual funds, trusts, and intellectual property businesses, enjoy tax breaks. Profit Tax Exemptions: Enterprises engaged in approved activities like asset transactions and private company investments may qualify for tax exemptions.

Compliance and Filing Obligations:

Timely adherence to filing requirements is paramount. The IRD issues annual Profit Tax Returns, typically in April, although the deadline may vary depending on your fiscal year-end. Penalties loom for tardy submissions, although newly registered businesses are granted an 18-month grace period for their inaugural return.

Seeking Professional Counsel:

While this guide furnishes a foundational understanding, the labyrinthine nature of Hong Kong’s tax system necessitates expert guidance. Consulting with a proficient tax advisor well-versed in industry regulations and your business operations is strongly advised. They can assist in:

Structuring your business for optimal tax efficiency. Leveraging applicable deductions and exemptions. Ensuring compliance with filing deadlines and reporting requisites.

Delving Deeper:

This guide offers a surface-level comprehension, but deeper exploration unveils a more comprehensive panorama:

Hong Kong’s tax regime offers simplicity and an array of benefits for businesses. By comprehending your company’s operations, exploring available incentives, and adhering to regulations, you can harness this system to your advantage. Remember, seeking professional guidance guarantees optimal tax efficiency and instills confidence in navigating the intricacies of Hong Kong’s tax landscape.

Our team is always ready to provide high-quality advice and help in solving any tasks you set. Subscribe to our pages on social networks. If you have any questions, want to order services or consultations from us, then follow this link or write to us on WhatsApp/Viber/Telegram +380 98 363 6493 or call us.

  1. Home

Taxation of a GmbH: Comprehensive Guide

A GmbH is a corporation and is therefore subject to taxation itself with its profit as a legal entity. In contrast, a partnership is not itself subject to taxation but only its shareholders.

In addition to the GmbH, its managing director is personally liable for the fulfilment of the tax obligations. This also applies if he is not a shareholder in the company. This is not only a material liability with the private property of the manager, but also a possible criminal sanction.

Corporate Tax Overview of GmbH

In Germany, GmbHs are subject to a uniform corporate tax rate of 15 percent on their profits, regardless of whether the profits are retained within the company or distributed to shareholders. The taxable income used for assessing corporate tax is determined based on the regulations outlined in the Income Tax Act and specific provisions within the Corporation Tax Act (§ 8 KStG to § 19 KStG). The commercial balance sheet, inclusive of the profit and loss account, serves as the foundation for calculating the taxable profit.

In the event that a GmbH incurs a loss during a fiscal year, and there are no legally designated special circumstances, this loss cannot be offset against the shareholder’s other income to reduce taxes in the originating year. Instead, the loss remains within the GmbH’s tax domain. The GmbH can only offset this loss against its own profits from previous or future years in order to minimize tax liabilities. Since 2004, a tax-free allowance of one million euros has been applied to carried forward losses, with only 60 percent of any excess losses being deductible for tax purposes.

Annual corporate income tax returns, along with the company’s financial statements, must be submitted electronically to the tax office. Quarterly advance payments of corporate tax are due after assessment by the relevant tax authority, with payments typically scheduled for March 10th, June 10th, September 10th, and December 10th of each year. These advance payments are credited towards the annual tax liability.

Profit distributions to shareholders, whether domestic or foreign, who are themselves corporations, are subject to a 5 percent tax on the received remuneration, which is levied at each level. Additionally, under § 8b para. 3 KStG, profits from investment disposals are subject to a fictitious 5 percent non-deductible business expense, even if no actual expenses were incurred. Consequently, only 95 percent of the profit from disposal is tax-exempt.

Overview of Capital Gains Tax

When profits of a limited liability company (GmbH) are distributed to individuals, they are generally required to withhold a capital gains tax of 25% (plus a 5.5% solidarity surcharge) on behalf of the recipient (e.g., shareholders) and remit it to the tax office. This tax deduction is carried out for the benefit of the recipient and does not directly affect the GmbH; only the remaining net amount is disbursed to the shareholder. The GmbH provides the shareholder with a tax certificate according to the prescribed format.

This tax deduction typically serves to fulfill the shareholder’s income tax obligations, acting as a final withholding tax. However, shareholders have the option to apply for taxation at their individual income tax rates, which may be lower. In such cases, the capital gains tax is offset against their income tax liability.

Special provisions apply to capital gains tax for foreign shareholders. In Germany, profits distributed are subject to a form of withholding tax, which may be offset against taxes owed in the shareholder’s home country according to applicable double taxation agreements. Compliance with the provisions outlined in these agreements is essential.

Shares in Private Corporations

When an individual privately holds shares in corporations and receives dividends or payments, they are subject to a withholding tax rate of 25 percent plus a solidarity surcharge. If the taxpayer’s personal income tax rate is lower than 25 percent, they can opt for an assessment corresponding to their rate. However, certain advertising expenses such as custodian fees are no longer deductible even under this circumstance. Individual investors can deduct a lump sum of 801 euros from their taxable income from capital assets.

Shares in Partnership Operating Assets

In cases where shareholders are partnerships themselves, a procedure known as “partial integration” is applied. Under this procedure, 40 percent of received payments are exempt from tax. The remaining 60 percent of dividends are fully taxable and are subject to the individual income tax rate of the respective shareholder. Proportional deductions (i.e., 60 percent) can be made for income-related expenses associated with dividend gains.

Profit distributions occur in two forms: open profit distribution (involving a resolution on profit appropriation by shareholders) and hidden profit distribution (when operating expenses are classified as profit distributions for tax purposes). The latter generates income from capital assets on the shareholder’s side, making it subject to capital gains tax. On the company’s side, it increases retained earnings and consequently its tax base. Capital gains tax is triggered when shareholders receive the profit distribution and must be paid together with a capital gains tax declaration by the 10th of the following month via electronic transmission to the tax office.

Hidden Profit Distributions: Understanding Tax Implications

According to tax court precedents, a “hidden profit distribution” occurs under corporation tax law when a shareholder or closely related individual benefits from inappropriate payments or other advantages, resulting in a reduction in the corporation’s assets. Such payments are considered equivalent to preventing an increase in assets. Another condition for a hidden profit distribution is that this action is prompted by the company’s relationship, such as instructions from the shareholder, affects the income amount, and is not part of an openly decided profit distribution in accordance with statutory provisions.

Typically, tax authorities uncover hidden profit distributions during audits, leading to increased profits and taxes for the company, along with additional tax liabilities. For individual shareholders lacking the lump-sum savings amount for capital income, the hidden profit distribution is taxed upon receipt. However, for shareholder corporations, up to 5 percent of the additional profit distribution is tax-free to avoid double taxation.

Attempts to return the advantage to the company long after the hidden profit distribution occurred are ineffective, even if the company has contractually obliged the shareholder to profit. If the company waives the agreed compensation in such cases, it results in another hidden profit distribution.

Hidden profit estimates fall into two categories:

  1. Transactions that a diligent manager wouldn’t have agreed to under normal market conditions, necessitating an arm’s length comparison for each case.
  2. Situations where clear, legally effective agreements aren’t made in advance between the corporation and its controlling shareholder, and subsequent agreements hold no tax effect.

Examples of hidden payouts include:

Hidden profit distributions primarily concern remuneration regulations, such as directors’ fees, pensions, bonuses, and company car usage. It’s crucial to assess the enforceability of planned regulations from both tax and legal standpoints before implementation.

Hidden profit distributions not only affect companies and shareholders but can also implicate managing directors, potentially leading to personal liability for tax liabilities and criminal consequences for tax evasion.

To mitigate these risks, legal representatives and shareholders should proactively identify hidden profit distribution risks, take appropriate action to avoid negative consequences, and stay informed about legal developments in this area.

Trade Tax: Understanding the Burden on Limited Liability Companies

Regardless of its operational activities, a limited liability company (GmbH) is classified as a business entity by its legal structure and is thus subject to trade tax. Unlike sole proprietorships or partnerships, GmbHs have broader options for deducting operating expenses, such as managerial salaries. However, they do not benefit from trade tax relief, such as exemptions or offsets against income tax liability.

Trade tax is imposed on the “trade income” (derived from profit) of the GmbH. However, trade tax burden is not deductible as a business expense when determining profits, following the corporate tax reform of 2008.

To calculate “trade income,” taxable profit or loss under corporation tax or income tax law is considered. Additions (e.g., 25 percent of interest on long-term debt) and reductions (e.g., 1.2 percent of the standard value of real estate used for business purposes and not exempt from property tax) are applied according to the Trade Tax Act. Trade losses from previous years can be deducted, but cannot be offset against other income and can only be carried forward within the same company, with certain limitations.

The trade income is then multiplied by a basic tax rate, typically 3.5 percent, resulting in the tax base. This base is further multiplied by the local tax rate of the municipality where the GmbH is registered. If the municipality hasn’t set a rate, it defaults to at least 200 percent since 2004.

The formula for trade tax burden is:

Trade income × basic tax rate × assessment rate = Trade tax liability

For example: 100 × 3.5 percent × 490 percent = 17.15 percent

For a GmbH with multiple locations, each municipality’s share in the trade tax measurement amount is determined by legally defined criteria, and each municipality applies its assessment rate accordingly. Generally, wage totals incurred for respective operating hours are used as the basis for distribution.

GmbHs must submit annual trade tax returns to the relevant tax office. Quarterly advance payments are based on the last assessment and are offset against the annual tax liability.

Trade tax payments are made to the municipalities, which assess them based on the trade tax measurement certificate issued by the responsible tax office.

Solidarity Surcharge:

The solidarity surcharge is applicable to both legal entities, such as GmbHs, and natural persons, including employees and managers of GmbHs. Currently set at 5.5 percent of corporation tax, capital gains tax, and wage tax, this surcharge must be paid alongside these taxes.

Wage Tax:

GmbHs, like any employer, are responsible for withholding income tax and other deductions (including the solidarity surcharge and church tax) from employees’ salaries as per their employment contracts and tax regulations. These withheld deductions are then offset against the employee’s income tax liability.

Value Added Tax (VAT):

VAT is applicable to every transaction involving goods and services, as well as the import and withdrawal of goods and services for non-entrepreneurial purposes, unless specific exemption provisions apply. The standard tax rate currently stands at 19 percent, calculated on the net invoice amount, while a reduced rate of 7 percent applies to certain goods and services like food, agricultural products, newspapers, and art objects.

Invoicing for VAT transactions must include specific information such as full names and addresses of both the service provider and recipient, tax numbers, date of issue, invoice number, details of the goods or services provided, and the corresponding tax amounts.

Entrepreneurs can deduct VAT amounts invoiced by other entrepreneurs, known as input tax, from their own VAT liability, provided they meet the necessary requirements for input tax deduction. VAT declarations and payments are typically due monthly or quarterly, with an annual declaration required at the end of the calendar year. Small entrepreneurs with turnovers below certain thresholds may be exempt from VAT but are also ineligible for input tax deduction.

Special regulations apply to trade in goods and services with EU and non-EU countries, including export documents and delivery thresholds. A VAT identification number (VAT number) is necessary for trading within the EU, which can be obtained from the Federal Central Tax Office.

Small entrepreneurs with turnovers below specified thresholds may opt for VAT exemption, though this decision is binding for at least five years and affects their ability to claim input tax deductions. This waiver may be advantageous depending on customer profiles and investment strategies.

Property Tax:

If a limited liability company owns real estate, such as developed or undeveloped land, it becomes subject to property tax. This tax is imposed by the municipality where the land is situated. The property tax is calculated based on the standard value of the land, multiplied by a rate of 3.5 per thousand. The resulting amount is then multiplied by the municipal property tax rate to determine the property tax liability. Typically, municipalities establish quarterly advance payments for property tax, with rates varying depending on the location. However, property tax burden is generally lower than that of trade tax. Quarterly payments, typically a quarter of the total property tax, are due on February 15th, May 15th, August 15th, and November 15th each year. Alternatively, upon request, the entire amount can be paid in one installment on July 1st of the year.

Land Transfer Tax:

When a limited liability company purchases real estate, it incurs land transfer tax as a one-time charge. The assessment is based on the purchase price or consideration paid, multiplied by a rate of 6.5 percent (applicable in North Rhine-Westphalia).

In cases involving acquisition, transformation, merger, or division of companies with real estate, careful consideration should be given to the imposition of land transfer tax. Seeking advice from a tax advisor is recommended to navigate these situations effectively.

Our team is always ready to provide high-quality advice and help in solving any tasks you set. Subscribe to our pages on social networks. If you have any questions, want to order services or consultations from us, then follow this link or write to us on WhatsApp/Viber/Telegram +380 98 363 6493 or call us.

  1. Home

Common Reporting Standard (CRS)

The global landscape of financial transparency has undergone a profound transformation in recent years. At the heart of this evolution lies the Common Reporting Standard (CRS), a groundbreaking initiative established in 2017 that fosters unprecedented collaboration among tax authorities worldwide. This intricate system automates the exchange of confidential personal and financial data concerning foreign nationals residing within participating jurisdictions. With over 70 tax authorities actively engaged, the CRS represents a monumental leap forward in the collective fight against tax evasion and the illicit concealment of assets in offshore accounts.

Early Evolution of Tax Data Exchange:

The seeds of the CRS were sown much earlier, in the early 2000s, with the introduction of the European Savings Directive in 2003. This directive aimed to combat tax evasion by mandating automatic information exchange between European Union member states on the income generated by savings accounts held by foreign residents. Building upon this success, the United States implemented the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) in 2010. FATCA targeted US nationals and businesses holding financial accounts abroad, requiring foreign financial institutions to report their financial information directly to the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Recognizing the effectiveness of these bilateral agreements, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) championed the development of a standardized, multilateral framework for automatic information exchange – the Common Reporting Standard. By 2014, the CRS was formally endorsed, paving the way for the first data exchanges in 2017.

Functionality of the CRS:

The CRS operates with meticulous precision. When a new customer opens an account with a financial institution in a participating country, the institution gathers a comprehensive set of personal details. This includes basic information like name, address, and date of birth, along with crucial financial identifiers such as tax residency and taxpayer identification number. For businesses, the scope of required information expands to include details like trading status and registration data. The key element lies in the concept of tax residency – if it differs from the country of residence, the financial institution triggers an automatic reporting process. The bank electronically transmits the customer’s data to the local tax authority, which then seamlessly shares it with the customer’s home tax authority. This swift and secure exchange of information empowers tax authorities to identify potential discrepancies and crack down on individuals and entities attempting to hide assets or income through offshore accounts.

Countries in the CRS Network:

The CRS network has woven a vast tapestry, encompassing over 70 tax authorities from across the globe. Each participating country commenced reporting at different intervals, with early adopters like the United Kingdom, Germany, and Australia leading the charge. Notably, the United States itself is not part of the CRS network, as it relies on its own robust FATCA framework for information exchange. However, numerous countries have established bilateral agreements with the US under FATCA, further solidifying the global crackdown on offshore tax evasion.

Full list of the countries in the CRS you can find via this link.

Distinguishing CRS from FATCA:

While both CRS and FATCA tackle the issue of offshore tax evasion, there are crucial distinctions to be made. At its core, the CRS functions as a multilateral framework for information exchange between jurisdictions, lacking the enforcement muscle of FATCA. Under FATCA, the US wields a powerful weapon: the authority to impose hefty penalties on non-compliant foreign financial institutions. This potent threat incentivizes foreign banks to diligently report the financial details of US citizens and businesses holding offshore accounts, effectively complementing the collaborative approach of the CRS.

Verification of Tax Residency:

The concept of tax residency plays a pivotal role in the CRS mechanism. It’s important to understand that tax residency is not a matter of choice; it’s a factual determination based on specific criteria established by each country’s tax laws. For individuals, factors like physical presence, permanent home, and economic ties typically hold sway. For businesses, the location of headquarters, management, and economic activity usually determine tax residency. However, navigating the intricacies of residency rules can be complex, especially for individuals with extensive international ties. The OECD website offers valuable resources, including a handy interactive tool, to help individuals determine their tax residency status under the CRS framework of most participating countries.

Beyond the Basics:

The CRS is not a static entity. Continuous improvements and upgrades are undertaken to address evolving challenges and enhance the effectiveness of the system. Recent developments include the expansion of the reporting scope to include beneficial ownership information, allowing tax authorities to identify the ultimate beneficiaries of financial accounts and combat tax avoidance through complex ownership structures. Additionally, the introduction of a multilateral competent authority agreement (MCAA) streamlines the resolution of potential disputes arising from information exchange under the CRS.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the Common Reporting Standard emerges as a dynamic and potent force in the global battle against offshore tax evasion. Its transformative impact resonates across financial landscapes, fostering transparency and collaborative efforts among nations. As the CRS adapts and expands its capabilities, it reinforces the collective commitment to constructing a financial environment free from the shadows of illicit financial activities. While the journey remains ongoing, the strides achieved with the CRS underscore a united front against those seeking to undermine the principles of financial integrity and accountability. The CRS not only marks a significant leap forward in combating tax evasion but also signifies a paradigm shift toward a more interconnected and vigilant global financial community. In the relentless pursuit of financial transparency, the CRS stands tall, exemplifying a commitment to a fair, accountable, and ethically sound global financial system.

Our team is always ready to provide high-quality advice and help in solving any tasks you set. Subscribe to our pages on social networks. If you have any questions, want to order services or consultations from us, then follow this link or write to us on WhatsApp/Viber/Telegram +380 98 363 6493 or call us.

  1. Home

Belgium and Netherlands Sign New Double Tax Treaty: Key Changes and Timeline

On 21 June 2023, the Finance Ministers of Belgium and the Netherlands finalized a new double tax treaty and protocol, which was officially published on 22 June 2023 (NL – FR).

This latest agreement is set to replace the existing Belgian-Netherlands double tax treaty, which was established in 2001 and later amended in 2009 through a protocol. Anticipating the introduction of this new treaty, the Belgian and Dutch tax authorities already acknowledged the 2001 treaty as a covered tax agreement for applying the Multilateral Instrument (“MLI”) in November 2021. Consequently, certain Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) measures have already been in effect for the 2001 treaty since 1 January 2022.

In addition to incorporating MLI provisions related to withholding tax relief, the concept of permanent establishment, and the introduction of a principal purpose test, among others, the new treaty includes various other provisions agreed upon by Belgium and the Netherlands. These changes have significant implications for the corporate environment. For specific details pertaining to employers and employees, a separate alert will be provided.

Notably, the first protocol to the new treaty explicitly states that the OECD Commentary should be applied when claiming treaty protection and/or treaty benefits, referring to it as “dynamic treaty interpretation.”

Key Changes in the New Belgium-Netherlands Tax Treaty:

  1. Tax Residency and Hybrid Entities: The new treaty features a hybrid entity clause that was already applicable through the MLI. It states that income derived from an entity or arrangement treated as tax-transparent for Belgian or Dutch tax purposes is considered income from a resident of the contracting state, as long as that state equally treats this income for tax purposes as income from a tax resident.
  2. Permanent Establishments: Following the application of the MLI, the definition of a permanent establishment (PE) under the 2001 treaty was supplemented with an anti-fragmentation rule, requiring certain conditions to be met to claim non-PE status for local presence with a preparatory or auxiliary character. The new treaty further expands the PE concept and includes anti-abuse measures.
  3. Withholding Taxes on Dividends: The new treaty replaces the previous 5% dividend withholding tax rate with a full exemption, provided the beneficial owner of the dividends is a company located in the other contracting state holding at least 10% of the distributing company’s capital for a 365-day holding period. A specific provision allows the Netherlands to tax dividends for up to 10 years after the migration of shareholders to Belgium.
  4. Withholding Taxes on Interest and Royalties: Under the new treaty, withholding taxes on interest and royalties are fully exempt, unlike the 10% withholding tax rate applicable in the 2001 treaty for interest.
  5. Director Fees: The new treaty aligns the scope of director fees with the OECD Model Convention, removing the broader coverage that the 2001 treaty had, which could lead to complexities under Belgian domestic tax legislation.
  6. Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP): While the 2001 treaty included a MAP, the new treaty text surprisingly omits the arbitration mechanism present in the MLI. For this mechanism to apply to the new treaty, both countries need to notify it as a covered tax agreement.
  7. Subject-to-Tax Rules: The protocol to the new treaty defines the conditions under which Belgian residents can be exempt from taxation for foreign income (excluding dividends, interest, and royalties). It also outlines the procedure for crediting foreign taxes against Belgian tax liability for Dutch-sourced interest and royalties.

Entry into Force:

Despite ongoing discussions concerning cross-border workers working from home, both countries decided to sign the treaty. The ratification procedures in the parliaments of Belgium and the Netherlands will determine the official entry into force. Assuming these processes are not completed before 2023, the new Belgium-Netherlands treaty is expected to take effect from 1 January 2025, applicable to income years starting from that date.

  1. Home

International tax optimization

International tax optimization is a strategy and practice aimed at minimizing tax liabilities for international companies through the use of various legal and financial instruments. It is based on the analysis and application of the tax regulations and policies of various countries in order to reduce the overall tax burden.

International tax optimization involves the development and implementation of tax strategies that allow companies to use tax credits, deductions, double tax treaties and other tools to reduce taxable profits and minimize tax payments.

International tax optimization plays an important role in today’s business environment and offers a number of significant benefits for companies operating internationally. By applying various tax strategies and instruments, companies can effectively reduce their overall tax burden and increase their competitiveness in the international market.

One of the key benefits of international tax optimization is the reduction of tax liabilities. Companies can use various tax strategies, such as the use of tax credits, deductions and double tax treaties, to reduce their taxable income and minimize tax payments. Tax incentives provide companies with the opportunity to take advantage of certain tax advantages provided by the state or region in which they operate. Deductions allow companies to take certain costs and expenses into account when calculating the tax base, resulting in a lower overall tax liability. Double tax treaties, in turn, help to avoid double taxation when carrying out international activities and reduce tax risks for companies.

Another important advantage of international tax optimization is the possibility of increasing the company’s profits. By reducing tax costs, companies free up additional funds that can be used to invest in business development, research and development, marketing, or other strategic initiatives. This enhances the company’s competitiveness and ability to attract new investors.

In addition, international tax optimization allows companies to manage the risks associated with taxation. Proper planning and compliance with tax requirements helps to avoid unwanted tax disputes and conflicts with the tax authorities, which can have a negative impact on the company’s reputation and financial results. It also allows companies to avoid having to pay fines and sanctions related to tax violations.

Finally, international tax optimization can help companies improve their operational efficiency. Analysis and optimization of tax processes allow companies to determine effective ways to manage tax liabilities and minimize the time and resource costs associated with taxation.

In general, international tax optimization provides companies with the opportunity to reduce tax liabilities, increase profits, manage tax risks and improve operational efficiency. However, it is important to note that when using tax strategies, companies must comply with the principles of legality and ethics, as well as take into account the requirements of the tax laws of the various countries in which they operate.

Choosing a country for company registration is an important step in international tax optimization. There are several key factors to consider when choosing a country:

  1. Tax system: One of the main factors when choosing a country for company registration is the tax system of that country. Different countries have different tax rates, tax rules and tax incentives. Therefore, it is important to study the tax legislation of the country and determine what tax advantages and opportunities it provides for companies.
  2. Double Tax Treaties: Check if there are double tax treaties between the selected countries. Such agreements can help avoid double taxation and simplify taxation when doing business between different countries.
  3. Business Environment and Investment Climate: Assess the business environment and investment climate in your chosen country. Infrastructure, availability of resources, the legal system, the stability of the political and economic situation – all these factors can significantly affect the success and efficiency of a business.

If you want to study the topic “how to choose a country for company registration” in more detail, follow the link to our article or if you want to learn more about international tax planning or order a service, then contact our company’s specialists at this link.

Copyright ©2025 All rights reserved.